Original article ISPreview UK:Read More

Bournemouth-based communications, IT and broadband provider 4Com has come in for criticism from some of their UK customers, who have complained about being hit by dramatically higher prices than they originally agreed over the phone. Sadly, business-to-business contracts lack many of the same protections as consumers enjoy, leaving some small firms in a dire situation.

According to the BBC News report, the owners of the Ashleigh Residential Home in Chesterfield thought – based on a 2023 call they had with a 4Com sales agents – that they were signing a contract for a fixed cost of £329 a month for two desk phones, two handheld phones, broadband and services on a 5-year contract.

However, when the first invoice arrived a couple of days later, the charges that it set out as being in the contract, which they had now signed, were different from what had been verbally promised over the phone (what’s that old saying.. “a verbal contract isn’t worth the paper it’s written on“). The BBC states that two years into the contract, they could be paying as much as £600 per month, which the owners claim “could finish the business“.

The catch is that 4Com did set out all of the charges in the paperwork that the business owners were ultimately sent and signed, albeit clearly without the owners realising that those charges were not what they thought had been agreed. In addition, the contract terms they had been sent ran for 7 years, not 5 years as discussed, and they had also signed a rental agreement with a separate finance company to hire the equipment.

A second business, a tool hire shop in Hinckley run by Craig Lakin, also complained about a similar experience to the BBC and has since been threatened with legal action if he does not pay more than £12,000 to the finance company who he said 4Com signed him up with to rent the phones. Craig said he would “rather close the business down, than give them the money” as “a matter of principle“.

In response, 4Com said they took the complaints seriously and were “extremely sorry to hear that these two customers are unhappy“. But the company added that it has had multiple interactions with the customers to confirm awareness of key contractual points prior to installation, and continually reviews processes to ensure communications are clear and easy to understand.

A 4Com Spokesperson told the BBC:

“Having thoroughly investigated the customer accounts and call records, we have seen no evidence that they were misled, in relation to either the contract price and structure, or the availability of a cooling-off period.”

Sadly, it’s not the first time we’ve seen situations like this crop up in the industry from different providers, and the BBC notes that they’ve also had a fair few other complaints about 4Com in the recent past (here). At the same time such customers can’t benefit from the Consumer Rights Act 2015 and Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations (CPR), as these don’t govern business-to-business contracts

Instead, business contracts tend to be subject to the Sale of Goods Act 1979 and Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977. For businesses the only real avenue is thus to complain to the ISP and then, if that fails, take the matter to court. But the costs and fear of taking the legal route often discourages its pursuit.

The Federation of Small Businesses (FSB) has suggested that the government could respond by bringing in a cooling-off period for small businesses. At the same time, the UK Small Business Minister, Blair McDougall MP, said it was “disgraceful to hear that small businesses are being taken advantage of in this way” and called on telecoms regulator Ofcom to do more to protect them.

The regulator itself reiterated that telecoms providers are required to give small businesses clear contract information and warned that, when they “see evidence of widespread issues, we’ve shown we can and will consider taking action“. For those with a long memory, Ofcom’s 2014/15 investigation and subsequent £200,000 fine of business comms provider Unicom may serve as a useful example (here).

In the meantime, while many consumers can often get away with simply skimming through contract terms, it’s particularly important for smaller businesses to always read the terms properly due to the lack of protections available if they fail to do so.

Original article ISPreview UK:Read More

The Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT), Liz Kendall, has now joined the chorus of displeasure at O2’s recent decision (here) to increase their annual mid-contract price rises beyond what customers agreed when they signed-up. In response, the minister has directed Ofcom’s CEO, Dame Melanie Dawes, to “look at in-contract price rises again“.

At the start of 2025 the industry regulator began requiring telecoms providers to adopt a new approach to mid-contract price hikes, which did away with the confusing percentage and inflation-based model (i.e. ISPs promoted mid-contract increases as CPI + 3.8% or similar) – replacing it with one that must now set out such price rises “clearly and up-front, in pounds and pence, when a customer signs up” (here). This made annual price hikes clearer and more transparent, but not necessarily cheaper.

In response, many providers later followed BT’s lead by setting out a new pricing policy that would increase the monthly price that customers pay by a flat £3 extra – effective from March or April each year (the level of increase can vary a bit between providers). But inflation has remained higher than originally anticipated and, partly as a result of that, BT recently announced that they would increase their annual hikes by an extra pound to £4.

Other providers have since started to follow by BT’s lead, but what really seems to have caught everyone’s attention was O2’s decision to go a step further by applying this to existing customers too (i.e. those who had signed-up via the previous policy). In fairness, O2 did allow customers impacted by this to exit their contract penalty free, which Ofcom acknowledged when expressing their own somewhat weak “disappointment” at the change last week (here).

However, the regulator also pointed out that O2’s approach goes against the “spirit” of their change, not least by ruining price transparency for consumers (i.e. we’re back to not being able to trust that ISPs won’t change the rules on us mid-flight). But Ofcom also failed to address the fact that the policies being adopted by most providers have a nasty tendency to unfairly penalise those on cheaper packages (the same increase is applied, regardless of how much your monthly package costs).

The Government’s Turn

The government have clearly been keeping an eye on all this, which last night resulted in Liz Kendall (MP), Secretary of State for DSIT, publishing a new Open Letter that directs Ofcom’s boss to “look at in-contract price rises again“. The letter also made several key recommendations and suggestions for the regulator (the letter is fairly short, so we’ll publish it in full first):

Liz Kendall’s Key Recommendations for Ofcom

1. Look at in-contract price rises again.

2. Undertake a “rapid review” on how easy it is for customers to switch providers.

3. Deliver increased transparency in telecoms bills, which could follow the same mould as “recent changes on electricity bills” to help highlight the costs of specific components of those bills.

4. Consider the possibility of adopting a similar regime to those such as insurance, where new and existing customers need to be offered the same deal.

Liz Kendall’s Open Letter to Ofcom

Dear Dame Melanie,

As we discussed when we met earlier this month, driving down inflationary costs and protecting consumers are vitally important for this government.

As such, I welcome both the action you took in January to increase transparency on how in-contract prices are presented in new contracts, and your statement yesterday expressing disappointment with O2’s price rises. I strongly agree they are against the spirit of your previous changes on pricing, and all the more disappointing given the current pressures on consumers.

Nevertheless, I believe we need to go further, faster. I am keen that we look at in-contract price rises again. O2’s recent decision to increase prices above the levels specified in the contract means that, under Ofcom’s rules, its customers can leave free of charge within 30 days. I would welcome your undertaking a rapid review on how easy it is for customers to switch providers – if companies are determined to increase pricing, it is beholden on us to make sure that customers are able to go elsewhere as easily as possible.

Similarly, I believe that, as with recent changes on electricity bills – which provide for greater transparency about the costs of specific components of those bills – increased transparency in telecoms bills could be a helpful mechanism to drive further clarity on pricing and investment. I would welcome views on how best to achieve that.

In addition, recognising that there is a decreasing number of people on legacy contracts but in an effort to take all action possible, would you write to telecoms companies to ask them to clearly and urgently communicate to customers with pre-January 2025 contracts, to ensure that those people are appropriately informed of their upcoming price rises. I would also welcome your assessment of the impact of the January changes to help us all identify where further transparency measures might be merited.

Finally, you will be aware that there have been calls for the sector to have a similar regime to those such as insurance, where new and existing customers need to be offered the same deal. So, for example, when an existing customer looks to renew their contract with their provider, they are provided with the price they would be charged if they were a new customer and have a choice over which deal to take. I understand Ofcom developed a discussion paper on this in 2023, and I would urge you to look at this as soon as possible.

I know you will agree that it is imperative that ordinary people feel empowered when interacting with the telecoms market, and that they can be confident they are getting a fair deal. So, given the importance of this agenda, I would be grateful if I could have a response by November 7th. My officials stand ready to discuss next week if helpful. I am, of course, very open if you have other suggestions in this space.

Yours sincerely

The Rt Hon Liz Kendall MP
Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology

In fairness to Ofcom, switching between telecoms providers has been made significantly quicker and easier in recent years thanks to systems like One Touch Switching (OTS) on broadband + landline phone and Text-to-Switch (Auto-Switch) on mobile. Likewise, we’re all for more transparency on telecoms bills, although this specific area hasn’t really caused too many complaints.

The key suggestion above seems to be where Kendall calls on Ofcom to consider the possibility of adopting a similar regime to those such as insurance, where new and existing customers need to be offered the same deal. Leaving aside the fact that these are two VERY different markets, there’s a risk that such an approach might choke-off the ability of providers to attract new customers via discounts, which might also reduce switching and thus risk raising prices.

In the above scenario, we continue to think it might be better to simply ban the practice of mid-contract price hikes, which wouldn’t stop ISPs from discounting the price across your first contract term. But even this approach does run into the potential for similar caveats, since some offers (e.g. 3-6 months free service on a 24-month term) might also be choked off. But we dare say that consumers would find general price reductions for the first term to still be both easier to understand and much easier to advertise, as well as to compare between providers. Convoluted discounts are a headache when it comes to service comparisons.

The law of unintended consequences remains a tricky one to balance, but it’s becoming increasingly clear that Ofcom’s last attempt at a halfway house style solution has not worked as well as they would have hoped. Instead, consumers who can least afford it (i.e. those on cheaper packages) are being hit by the biggest hikes and transparency is also being wrecked by providers changing the rules mid-flight. We await Ofcom’s solution with great interest.

Original article ISPreview UK:Read More

Infracapital-backed broadband ISP Fibrus, which is rolling out a full fibre network across parts of Northern Ireland and Cumbria (England), has joined other internet providers in launching their Black Friday sales for new customers. The provider is also offering up to £400 of buyout credit if your old ISP hits you with Early Termination Charges (ETC).

Customers looking to join the provider will now pay from just £17.99 per month for their entry-level 159Mbps (34Mbps upload) package, which rises to £23.99 for 518Mbps (104Mbps upload) and £32.99 for 982Mbps (310Mbps upload); this is several pounds cheaper per month than their previous offers. In addition, those taking their 518Mbps plan will also get a £30 Amazon Gift Card and that rises to £100 on their 982Mbps tier.

As usual, all packages come attached to a 24-month minimum contract term, included wireless router and free installation. The operator’s full fibre network now covers 440,000 premises and is home to 130,000 customers.

Original article ISPreview UK:Read More

Network builder and broadband ISP CommunityFibre, which has invested c.£1bn to deploy a 5Gbps speed full fibre (FTTP) network across 1.342 million UK homes (inc. 185k businesses within 200 metres of their network) – mostly in London, has launched their Black Friday discounts and begun offering the first 6 months of service for free on ALL of their packages.

The special offer means that prices will now start at £21 per month (after the first 6 months of free service) for their entry-level 100Mbps (symmetric) tier on a 24-month term and rise up to £61 for their top 5Gbps (5,000Mbps) package. But take note that these prices will jump to £23 and £63 per month, respectively, from April 2027 – once their annual (£2) mid-contract price hikes kick in.

All packages include a wireless router, free installation and unlimited data usage. At the end of your contract, the price will increase again by £4 versus your last month. The Black Friday discount will be available to order by new customers until 2nd December 2025.

Original article ISPreview UK:Read More

Mobile and internet provider giffgaff, which is owned by Telefónica UK (VMO2), has today informed ISPreview that their recently launched (here) full fibre broadband products for homes – powered by nexfibre and Virgin Media’s networks – have now been made available to people living in the Cathedral City of Chester (Cheshire, England).

Just to recap. giffgaff are offering three unlimited plans on a monthly rolling (30-day) term – the 200Mbps (symmetric) service costs £30 per month, while 500Mbps is £32 and their top 900Mbps tier is £35 – plus installation is currently free. Customers in nexfibre areas who sign-up to this service can expect to receive an Amazon eero 6+ router (inc. giffgaff branded User Interface) and engineers will also install an Optical Network Terminal (ONT) from Arcadyan Technology (PB6802B-LG) inside your home.

The catch is that giffgaff have been conducting a gradual, phased regional roll-out. As it stands, the service is now available to over 360,000 properties in North West England, as well as select locations in North West England, Yorkshire and the Humber, East Midlands and rolling out in the North East, Scotland, South West and Wales and then across more locations before the end of the year and into 2026

So Chester is just the latest location to be added in this ongoing process, which does make things quite confusing for consumers. But we note that the prices have been reduced a bit more since the packages first went live in September 2025.

Original article ISPreview UK:Read More

Mobile and broadband operator Sure has today started the process of switching off their old copper line telecoms (phone and broadband) network on the English Channel Island of Guernsey, which comes as the network operator’s roll-out of a new gigabit-capable full fibre (FTTP) network on the island nears imminent completion.

Just to recap. Sure is working alongside the States of Guernsey on a joint £37.5m project (£12.5m of public investment) to build a new Fibre-to-the-Premises (FTTP) network across the whole of Guernsey (30,000+ premises) by the end of 2026 (i.e. end of 2025 for build completion and 2026 for copper retirement).

The latest update reveals that 93% of homes on the island are now covered by the new full fibre network and 67.7% of properties have already connected to this network (over 20,000 homes), which is up from coverage of 75% and take-up by 15,000 homes at the end of 2024.

As a result, Sure has this week begun the next phase, which involves switching off their old copper line phone and broadband network in stages (this will continue throughout 2026).

Cyrille Joffre, Leader of the Fibre Rollout, said:

“Customers can now enjoy the power of fibre broadband – from working efficiently at home to supporting children’s online learning and streaming their favourite entertainment. Fibre delivers consistently fast, reliable speeds up to 2Gbps, so there are options to suit every home and lifestyle.

The team has worked tremendously hard to deliver a world-class fibre network to the island on time and on budget, and we’re now on the home straight – which is fantastic for Guernsey’s connectivity and customers’ increasingly digital lives.

Switching to fibre is quick and seamless. The old copper network is being retired, so it’s vital that everyone – even landline-only customers – switches to fibre to stay connected.”

Anyone who has not yet switched and is in an area where the copper network is due to be switched-off will receive up to three visits with contact information left if no one is at home. This is closely followed by three letters communicating the imminent copper service cease, the third and final letter being hand-delivered.

Original article ISPreview UK:Read More

Network operator Openreach (BT) has issued a progress update on their ongoing roll-out of a new Fibre-to-the-Premises (FTTP) based broadband ISP network in rural parts of Staffordshire and Lancashire (England), which forms part of their Project Gigabit contracts with the government (these entered the construction phase earlier this year).

We’ll start with the usual recap. Over the past 1-2 years Openreach has been selected to deliver all of Project Gigabit’s Cross-Regional (Type C) procurements (here, here and here) via a Single Supplier Framework agreement (here) – currently reflecting £745m in total public subsidy to help upgrade 297,000 premises to full fibre technology in some of the hardest to reach parts of rural England, Scotland and Wales (i.e. premises with no prior access to gigabit connectivity).

The areas covered by these Type C contracts typically reflect locations where no or no appropriate market interest had previously been expressed before to the Government’s umbrella Building Digital UK (BDUK) agency, or areas that have been de-scoped or terminated from a prior plan. Areas like the ones above are often skipped due to being too expensive (difficult) for smaller suppliers. All the other Project Gigabit contracts have gone to smaller alternative networks (altnets).

Openreach actually entered the build phase for their related contracts in Wales, Lancashire, Devon, Wiltshire, Hertfordshire and Staffordshire a few months ago (here). But the operator has today issued a couple of progress updates, which revealed the next batches of locations to be targeted by their ongoing deployment in Staffordshire and Lancashire.

Openreach’s Project Gigabit Progress (Next Locations)

Staffordshire

Openreach engineers are expected to reach more properties in and around Wolseley Bridge, Acton Trussell, Acton Gate, Bednall, Bednall Head, Brocton, Dunston, Dunston Heath, Penkridge, Rodbaston, Stretton, Hatherton, Cannock, Rugeley and Calf Heath.

Lancashire

Openreach engineers are expected to reach more properties in and around Newchurch-in-Pendle, Roughlee, Fence, Barnoldswick, Oswaldtwistle, Great Harwood, Pendleton, West Bradford, Waddington, Twiston, Rimington, Gisburn, Whalley, Trawden, Foulridge, Barrowford, Bracewell, Blackrod, Simonswood, Bickerstaffe, Scarisbrick, Cockerham, Barton, Scorton, Eagland Hill, Woodplumpton, Greenhalgh, Longton, Little Hoole, Hoghton, Bamber Bridge, Chorley, Heath Charnock, Anglezarke, Appley Bridge, Wrightington, Dalton, Skelmersdale and Lathom.

In total, Openreach’s Full Fibre network now reaches more than 340,000 properties across Staffordshire and more than 570,000 properties across Lancashire, although these totals also include their existing commercial deployments and coverage.

Telecoms Minister, Liz Lloyd, said:

“Whether it’s families streaming together, farmers being able to use new technology, or businesses reaching more customers online, this upgrade creates real opportunities for communities across Staffordshire.

By delivering infrastructure that will serve these communities for decades to come, we’re making sure everyone can benefit from the digital world, no matter where they live.”

Kasam Hussain, Openreach Partnership Director, said:

“We’re bringing faster, more reliable broadband to some of the most rural properties in the region and letting local people know what to expect. This is a major infrastructure upgrade, so there will be more engineering teams, equipment and vans around town, and we’re working hard to keep disruption to a minimum.

Wherever possible, we’ll use our existing network of ducts and poles to avoid roadworks, new street furniture and disturbance. But there may be places where we need to install new poles, underground ducts and fibre cables because it’s the only way to make sure households get included in the upgrade.

Openreach is committed to building the best full fibre network, and doing it sustainably is crucial for our business, the communities we serve, and the environment we all share. As part of our ‘Let’s Reach Zero’ strategy, we aim to lower our carbon emissions, use less and waste less material, and protect nature wherever we operate.”

The new service, once live, can be ordered via various ISPs, such as BT, Sky Broadband, TalkTalk, Vodafone and more (Openreach FTTP ISP Choices) – it is not currently an automatic upgrade, although some providers have started to do free automatic upgrades as older copper-based services and lines are slowly withdrawn.

Original article Total Telecom:Read More

Partner Article 

The solution provides data centre operators a more holistic approach to their entire portfolio, providing unified security and network optimisation

The global data centre (DC) industry is experiencing a surge in investment and expansion, driven by escalating demand for cloud services, AI workloads, and edge computing. Once dominated by vast, centralised hyperscale facilities, the market is now shifting toward a more distributed model that places smaller, strategically located DCs closer to the end user. This strategic shift provides numerous benefits to the customer, providing enabling lower latency, improved resilience, and greater flexibility, but it is not without its challenges.

Running numerous DCs across different regions, each built using equipment from different vendors, is operationally complex. From network optimisation across sites to cybersecurity, managing distributed DCs is costly, and difficult to deploy and maintain.

At the Ultra-Broadband Forum (UBBF), jointly organised by Huawei and the United Nations Broadband Commission, Huawei showcased its answer to these challenges: Xinghe AI Fabric 2.0.

Building for the AI era

Huawei launched its first iteration of AI Fabric back in 2018 – a time when few could have imagined the speed with which the ‘AI era’ was to arrive. Nonetheless, this first release anticipated much of the pressure that AI’s widespread development and deployment would place on the DC industry, focussing on delivering zero packet loss, lower latency, and higher throughput. This provided a strong foundation for AI training, distributed storage, and high-performance computing (HPC).

In 2025, however, simply improving the traditional network is no longer enough. Date centre operators today are looking to AI to help alleviate their biggest pain points: slow deployment, manual operations, and network unreliability.

Solving these problems has been the primary focus of Huawei’s Xinghe AI Fabric 2.0, which combines a variety of AI-powered solutions to improve network security, reliability, and operations and maintenance (O&M).

From fault detection to network optimisation

First among these solutions is Huawei’s StarryWing Digital Map, which is coupled with AI to automate the notoriously complex process of cross-DC network and security provisioning. By integrating security data, this platform dynamically generates a security access matrix, which then automatically recommends policy solutions with 100% accuracy within two minutes. This replaces a previously manual scripting process that would take a typical team two days to complete.

The second element is the introduction of its AI agent, NetMaster. This platform combines four systems – unified detection, network automation, O&M management platform, and traffic visualisation – using over 45 APIs. This allows for natural language orchestration, enabling the automated resolution of 80% of fault tickets and reducing average resolution time by over 90%. This is supported by the AI Eagle Eye Engine, which uses Huawei’s proprietary IFIT (In-situ Flow Information Telemetry) technology to detect and localise faults in seconds, compared to the hours that has long been the norm.

Finally, the Xinghe AI Fabric 2.0 is aiming to dramatically reduce the impact of network outages for DC network operators. It’s Data Plane Crossing Faults (DPCF) technology uses intelligent identification and automatic switching to reduce network fault recovery time from hours to minutes, while its Dynamic Path Fast Recovery (DPFR) technology resolves local failures in just 1ms. Finally, its M-LAG technology focuses on the link itself, using optical module channel protection to improve its reliability ten-fold. Combined, this three-layer approach to outages adds significant resilience, ensuring maximum uptime across deployments.

An automation philosophy: Using AI to support AI

By incorporating AI throughout the platform’s design, DC operators’ networks are increasingly optimised, but also flexible, able to respond quickly and accurately to network faults or cybersecurity incidents without manual oversight. With service demands from enterprise customers, latency-sensitive applications, and AI workloads increasing in prominence, the ability for networks to self-deploy, self-heal, and self-optimise will soon become a necessity.

Ultimately, Xinghe AI Fabric 2.0 is the natural evolution of DC network architecture, representing the latest example of Huawei’s prevailing design philosophy of leveraging AI to support AI, here called ‘AI for Fabric and Fabric for AI’. Huawei is rapidly embracing AI throughout its portfolio, building systems that can self-evolve to meet the changing needs of a rapidly changing AI world.

Keep up to date with all of the latest telecoms news from around the world with the Total Telecom newsletter

Also in the news
Connected Britain Award winners 2025 announced!
Netomnia announces ‘powerful and ambitious’ rebrand ahead of Connected Britain
VodafoneThree drops Samsung, relies on Nokia and Ericsson for £2bn network upgrade

Original article Total Telecom:Read More

Viewpoint

Germany stands at a decisive inflection point in its digital infrastructure journey. Fibre rollout is now officially deemed of overriding public interest until 2030 — yet the country’s deployment remains uneven, delayed by fragmented execution, overlapping jurisdictions, and competing incentives.

While billions have been committed and technology keeps improving, progress is constrained by a deeper paradox: the fibre challenge is no longer technical — it’s relational.

This whitepaper argues that Germany’s digital acceleration depends on a new generation of radically interoperable partnerships — where Telco’s, utilities, municipalities, and innovators move beyond competition to build shared value ecosystems.

Drawing from cross-sector case studies, economic modelling, and policy analysis, this paper proposes a “Partnership Compact for Germany 2030”, outlining how collaborative infrastructure can deliver faster rollout, smarter investment, and stronger digital sovereignty. The path forward demands a mind-set shift: from trenching faster to partnering smarter.

The State of Fibre in Germany
Germany’s Fibre Landscape 2025: Progress and Patchwork
Germany’s digital ambitions are clear. The federal government has declared fibre-optic network
expansion to be of overriding public interest until 2030, signalling an unprecedented policy
commitment to closing the connectivity gap. Yet despite this clarity of intent, the reality on the
ground tells a more complicated story.

As of early 2025, only approximately 40% of German households have access to fibre-to-the
home (FTTH) connections. This figure masks significant disparities: while major urban centres
see competitive offerings from multiple providers, rural and semi-rural regions continue to struggle with inadequate coverage. The digital divide is not merely a matter of geography — it reflects deeper structural challenges in how infrastructure is planned, financed, and deployed.

Germany’s telecommunications landscape is uniquely fragmented. Dozens of operators, represented by associations including BREKO (Federal Association of Broadband and Telecommunications), BUGLAS (Federal Association of Carriers and Services), and VATM (Association of Telecommunications and Value-Added Service Providers), are simultaneously building networks across overlapping territories. While this competitive energy has driven innovation and investment, it has also led to inefficiencies: parallel trenching in profitable areas, underinvestment in challenging terrain, and coordination failures that delay projects and inflate costs.

The Partnership Paradox
Here lies the central tension: everyone agrees that cooperation is essential, yet meaningful collaboration remains scarce. Industry roundtables produce consensus statements. Policy forums emphasize coordination. Yet on the ground, competitive instincts, regulatory complexity, and misaligned incentives keep stakeholders working in parallel rather than in partnership.

The irony is stark. Germany has no shortage of capital — public funding schemes, private investment vehicles, and European recovery funds have mobilized billions for digital infrastructure. The technology is mature and proven. The regulatory framework has been clarified. What remains missing is the connective tissue between actors: the trust mechanisms, governance structures, and economic incentives that would enable true collaborative infrastructure at scale.
The real constraint is coordination — not capital or technology.

Research Question
This whitepaper addresses a fundamental challenge: How can Germany unlock collaborative infrastructure models that balance competition, efficiency, and public good? The answer requires moving beyond traditional dichotomies of public versus private, or competition versus monopoly. It demands exploring a third way: structured co-opetition, where operators compete on services while cooperating on infrastructure; where municipalities act as neutral conveners rather than competitors; where data and governance become shared assets that accelerate deployment without compromising commercial differentiation.

The following sections examine the economic rationale for collaboration, draw lessons from adjacent sectors that have navigated similar transitions, propose governance frameworks for shared digital infrastructure, and outline a concrete policy pathway toward a Partnership Compact for Germany 2030.

Download the whitepaper: The Partnership Paradox_Final draft

Join the discussion about Germany’s fibre future in Munich on the 18 – 19 November 2025. Get your ticket here: Connected Germany 2025 | München

Original article ISPreview UK:Read More

Eastbourne-based broadband ISP Lightning Fibre, which is building a new multi-gigabit speed full fibre (FTTP) broadband network across parts of Sussex and Kent in England (they also hold a partnership to harness CityFibre’s network around the South Coast – here), has today launched a range of early Black Friday sales on their packages.

Customers covered by the service can now take their entry-level 150Mbps (symmetric speed) package for just £22 per month (reduced from £26) on a 24-month term, while 300Mbps has been reduced to £24 (£28), 500Mbps is now just £26 (£32), 900Mbps is £29 (£36) and their top 2000Mbps package has been slashed to just £35 (£44). All of these include free setup, unlimited data and a wireless router (you get a higher end device on their 900Mbps+ plans).

The company also offers an accessible Social Tariff for households in receipt of means tested benefits and pension credits, providing 50Mbps upload and download, guaranteed at the modem, for £15 per month on a rolling 30-day agreement with no credit checks.

The provider’s Chief Commercial Officer (CCO), Rob Reaks, said: “Our Winter Sale is the perfect time for new customers to switch and for existing ones to upgrade at a fantastic price. It runs from 1st November until 31st December.”

The same announcement notes that their sale “coincides with a significant network expansion” via their wholesale agreement with CityFibre, although for some reason they don’t mention precisely what this network expansion covers. The original partnership merely announced expanded coverage across additional premises in Polegate, Eastbourne and Hastings.